back to:

Report
Index

SV CTD Comparison
RV Celtic Explorer Cruise CE17-01
July 22nd to August 6th 2017
John E. Hughes Clarke
Anand Hiroji
Jose Cordero Ros
Center for Coastal and Ocean Mapping
University of New Hampshire

Overview:

On 25 July, at 1030 GMT in 50.80 N – 008 00 W, a sound velocity profilers comparison was conducted in 115 m depth. The purpose of this test was to determine the need of calibrating any of these instruments. Four different instruments, measuring sound speed and pressure (depth) were attached to a CTD rosette or to a MVP-200 cable end and they were dipped down to 97 m. There following table lists the instruments used.

INSTRUMENT               

SERIAL NUMBER

LOCATION DURING TEST

Valeport MIDAS SVX2

40335

            Rosette

Valeport MIDAS SVX2

29944

            Rosette

Valeport Mini SVP

3480

            Rosette

Seabird 911 plus CTD

0903

            Rosette

AML Micro Smart

4791

    MVP-200 dip fish

Table 1. Instruments used during the profile comparison

The results of this test showed a clear match among the readings, although the sensor used in the MVP (AML Micro Smart) presented some differences. Most of these discrepancies were smaller than 0.2 m/s and therefore can be neglected. But some of them were notorious and they were located in the velocline depth range (depths between 25-35 m) . These values were up to 2 m/s , neglecting the depth sensors inaccuracies . Overall, the results were satisfactory and all sensors tested were considered valid for the survey without the need of calibration.



Profiles readingsProfileProfile
Plot 1. Profilers comparison
 

Rosette view

Picture 1. CTD Rosette with SVP attached before being dipped.